People ex rel. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Colorado Eastern Railway Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.
This is a proceeding under the statute which provides a *302remedy to redress those wrongs which were remediable at the common law by information in the nature of quo warranto. Except probably by original proceedings in the supreme court, no information can now be successfully prosecuted. Chapter 27 of the code has been held to provide a substituted remedy and to repeal all antecedent legislation on this subject. Waterman on Corporations, vol. 2, sec. 380; People ex rel. v. Londoner, 13 Colo. 303.
The importance of this suggestion will appear from a brief statement of the complaint. It is filed at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leslie v. . LorillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Matter of B., W. and N. Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People ex rel. Barton v. LondonerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.