Legal Opinion

State v. Overton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1985No. 84-1736PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Although the reasons given by the trial court for departing from the recommended sentencing guideline range justify the departure, and a written transcript of the sentencing hearing containing a statement *608of reasons satisfies the requirement of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 d. 11 that “[a]ny sentence outside of the guidelines must be accompanied by a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure” (emphasis supplied), Brady v. State, 457 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Fleming v. State, 456 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Burke v. State, 456 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 5th DCA…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. State v. BatehSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. Bateh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. Helton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vance v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Valdes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API