Legal Opinion

West End Homes, Inc. v. Soldinger

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBem-jamiet Breneteb, J.

Defendants Soldinger move, pursuant to subdivisions 1 and 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and for insufficiency. The complaint alleges that defendant Guttman held $1,000 in escrow to assure certain completions and installations in a dwelling sold to the Soldingers; that upon the completions aforesaid the escrow agent refused to pay over the fund in violation of the agreement and that the moving defendants claim all or part of such moneys. Judgment is demanded adjudging the escrow fund to be plaintiff’s sole property, that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Delehanty v. HurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Labasin v. President Realty Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Manufacturer's & Traders Trust Co. v. Reliance InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API