Cooke v. University of North Dakota
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Paula Cooke appealed from a district court judgment dismissing her complaint against the University of North Dakota (“UND”). We hold N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-04(l)’s notice of claim requirement is consistent with exhaustion of remedies theory. To comply with both, a party must present the requisite notice under N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-04(1) and pursue available administrative remedies prior to initiating a lawsuit. Because Cooke failed to comply with N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-04(1), the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In April 1998, Paula Cooke was an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- North Dakota Department of Human Services v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Earnest v. GarciaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BeilkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Dimond v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Higher EducationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Ungar v. North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HaskellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Kautzman v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Skjervem v. Minot State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.