Legal Opinion

Cooke v. University of North Dakota

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1999No. 990235PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Paula Cooke appealed from a district court judgment dismissing her complaint against the University of North Dakota (“UND”). We hold N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-04(l)’s notice of claim requirement is consistent with exhaustion of remedies theory. To comply with both, a party must present the requisite notice under N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-04(1) and pursue available administrative remedies prior to initiating a lawsuit. Because Cooke failed to comply with N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-04(1), the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In April 1998, Paula Cooke was an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. North Dakota Department of Human Services v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Earnest v. GarciaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. BeilkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dimond v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Higher EducationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ungar v. North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. HaskellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Kautzman v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Skjervem v. Minot State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API