Legal Opinion

Suites at New Orleans, LLC v. Lloyd's London

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 2009No. 2009-C-0562PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.

hThe issue before this court is whether an intervenor has standing to object to a party-defendant’s request for a jury trial after a hearing in the trial court where the party-defendant requesting the jury agreed that the case would proceed as a bench trial. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the intervenor has no standing to object to a party-defendant’s request for a jury trial and, accordingly, the trial court, did not err by refusing to strike the named party-defendant’s request for ,a jury.

The underlying facts of this case are not material to the issue…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Lombard; Concurrence · Belsome.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rubion Transfer & Storage Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  2. Succession of DelesdernierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Parish v. HollandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  4. Leger v. KentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Taylor v. Tulane University of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tolliver v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. 1026 Conti Condominiums, LLC v. 1025 Bienville, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Larry Tolliver v. Bob BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API