Suites at New Orleans, LLC v. Lloyd's London
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.
hThe issue before this court is whether an intervenor has standing to object to a party-defendant’s request for a jury trial after a hearing in the trial court where the party-defendant requesting the jury agreed that the case would proceed as a bench trial. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the intervenor has no standing to object to a party-defendant’s request for a jury trial and, accordingly, the trial court, did not err by refusing to strike the named party-defendant’s request for ,a jury.
The underlying facts of this case are not material to the issue…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Lombard; Concurrence · Belsome.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rubion Transfer & Storage Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Succession of DelesdernierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Parish v. HollandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Leger v. KentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Taylor v. Tulane University of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tolliver v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- 1026 Conti Condominiums, LLC v. 1025 Bienville, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- Larry Tolliver v. Bob BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014