Legal Opinion
Lutz v. Krokoff
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael C. Lynch, J.
The petitioner began working as a police officer in the patrol division for the respondent City of Albany in June 2008. On December 11, 2010, while off duty, he was arrested and charged with violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3) (driving while intoxicated). Because petitioner refused to take a chemical test, the Department of Motor Vehicles revoked his driver’s license.
On April 8, 2011, the respondent Steven Krokoff, the City of Albany Chief of Police, wrote to petitioner to advise that he was aware that petitioner’s license had been revoked.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Felix v. New York City Department of Citywide Administrative ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- New York State Office of Children v. LantermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re the Arbitration between Jandrew & County of CortlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Stolzman v. New York State Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Piasecki v. Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lutz v. KrokoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Lutz v. KrokoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012