Legal Opinion

Tyler v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 6, 2025No. 5:19-cv-01102Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CLARENCE MADISON TYLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-19-01102-JD ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is the United States’ Motion in Limine (“Motion”) [Doc. No. 78]. Plaintiff Clarence Madison Tyler (“Mr. Tyler”) responded in opposition (“Response”) [Doc. No. 85]. The United States seeks to exclude the testimony of Mr. Tyler’s wife and pastor as irrelevant, duplicative, cumulative, and a waste of the Court’s time. Additionally, the United States seeks to limit the testimony of Dr.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Barbara R. Jonasson, Jeanne Norgren, Patricia Twohill v. Lutheran Child and Family Services, Doing Business as Lutherbrook Children's Center SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API