Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Willes

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 16, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law expressly permits a summary proceeding to be instituted by the legal representative or the attorney for the landlord, among others (Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 721, subd 8). The petition under review was made by counsel as "attorney” for landlord and it was verified by him, under CPLR 2106, by affirmation in lieu of an oath before a notary.

The purpose of CPLR 2106 is to simplify the attorney’s practice and save him time and the inconvenience of appearing before a notary public. In this context, the provision of CPLR 2106 which…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schutzer v. Suss-KolyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. In re the Village of Herkimer Republican PartyNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API