Legal Opinion
United States v. Stephen Bryant Borrelli
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 4, 1980No. 79-1133PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Stephen Bryant Borrelli was tried and convicted of bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 2113(a). On appeal, Borrelli contends that the trial court erred in (1) admitting evidence obtained as a result of his arrest by state police officers for aiding an escapee, (2)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stone v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Charles C. Randolph, D/B/A Hardens Fried Chicken v. Collectramatic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. James Earl PaivaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Noah Beverly Johnny P. Crockett Douglas A. TurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Edwin Thomas BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. JackmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.