Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Dyer

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 23, 1936No. 4-4234PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute, most of them being stipulated. On March 2, 1929, E. T. Dyer, deceased husband of appellee, contracted with appellant to finance him to make a crop during said year to the extent of $2,000. On said date he executed and delivered his note to appellant for said sum, due November 1, 1929, and secured by a mortgage on certain chattels and all crops to be grown by him. At appellant’s suggestion or by his requirement, Mr. Dyer- applied for and was issued a policy of life insurance in the Reliance Life Insurance Company in the sum of $3,000, the first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Townes v. KrumpenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Hoge v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. Modern Industrial BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API