Legal Opinion
Bezanson v. Bayside Enterprises, Inc. (In re Medomak Canning)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 28, 1990No. Nos. 90-1311, 90-1312PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Acme Engineering Company (“Acme”) and Cara Corporation (“Cara”) appeal from an order of the district court affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of their cross-claim against Bayside Enterprises, Inc. (“Bayside”) and Poultry Processing, Inc. (“PPI”). 111 B.R. 371. The bankruptcy court ruled that appellants’ cross-claims asserting equitable subordination against appellees were barred by the doctrine of res judicata, because the Chapter 7 Trustee in bankruptcy for Medomak Canning Company (“Medomak”) had earlier compromised the estate’s equitable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Petitioning Creditors of Melon Produce, Inc. v. Joseph Braunstein, Trustee, Melon Produce, Inc. v. Peter KargerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Richard C. Becherer v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner And Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Wolf v. Tzanides (In re Tzanides)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.