Legal Opinion · Dissent

Granada Insurance Co. v. Mark A. Cereceda, D.C., P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 2008No. 3D07-2000Published

1DissentShepherd, J.

The issue in this second-tier certiorari case is whether the physician report requirement, found in the “withdrawal of benefit” section of Florida’s Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, section 627.736(7)(a), Florida Statutes (2002) (emphasis added), applies as well to a decision of a personal injury protection (PIP) carrier, Granada Insurance Company, to deny a claim or make a partial payment without terminating coverage. The Miami-Dade County Court found that a physician’s report was required, and the circuit court appellate division affirmed the decision of the county court per curiam without…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Haines City Community Dev. v. HeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. KaklamanosSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Progressive Exp. v. McGRATH CHIROPRACTICDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. STATE FARM FLORIDA INS. CO. v. LorenzoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  5. United Auto. Ins. Co. v. VilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API