Granada Insurance Co. v. Mark A. Cereceda, D.C., P.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentShepherd, J.
The issue in this second-tier certiorari case is whether the physician report requirement, found in the “withdrawal of benefit” section of Florida’s Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, section 627.736(7)(a), Florida Statutes (2002) (emphasis added), applies as well to a decision of a personal injury protection (PIP) carrier, Granada Insurance Company, to deny a claim or make a partial payment without terminating coverage. The Miami-Dade County Court found that a physician’s report was required, and the circuit court appellate division affirmed the decision of the county court per curiam without…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Haines City Community Dev. v. HeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. KaklamanosSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Progressive Exp. v. McGRATH CHIROPRACTICDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- STATE FARM FLORIDA INS. CO. v. LorenzoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- United Auto. Ins. Co. v. VilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.