Legal Opinion

Shirley v. Mazzone

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 13, 1991No. 1901348, 1901463 and 1901464PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole issue in this case is whether the award of attorney fees to the plaintiffs' counsel out of the proceeds of a sale of certain real property in Baldwin County was erroneous. The history of this case is protracted and involves three prior appeals to this Court. See Cherry v. Mazzone, 568 So.2d 799 (Ala. 1990); Hall v. Mazzone, 540 So.2d 1353 (Ala. 1988); and Hall v.Mazzone, 486 So.2d 408 (Ala. 1986). The parties pertinent to this appeal, and their respective interests, are as follows:

[EDITORS' NOTE: The chart IS ELECTRONICALLY NON-TRANSFERRABLE.]

On November 27, 1984, Miriam Hall Mazzone…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Irons v. Le SueurSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Cherry v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carver v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Anderson v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Holman v. BaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Buckley v. SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Jernigan v. JerniganCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API