Legal Opinion

Christopher Henkel and Lisa Henkel v. Christopher Norman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2014No. 13-0712PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Per curiam

At issue in this premises liability case is whether a homeowner’s “don’t slip” statement to a mail carrier was adequate as a matter of law to warn him of an icy sidewalk. The trial court determined that it was and granted summary judgment to the homeowner defendants. The court of appeals reversed. Because we agree with the trial court, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and remand to the court of appeals for it to consider the issues it did not reach.

The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants in this case, so our standard of review is de novo. See Buck v. Palmer, 381…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frost National Bank v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. CMH Homes, Inc. v. DaenenTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Stiles v. Resolution Trust Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Robert v. Buck and Queen Isabella Development Joint Venture v. G. J. Palmer, Jr.Texas Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Randy Austin v. Kroger Texas, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Pamela McCarty v. Hillstone Restaurant GrouCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Katy Venture, Ltd. and Katy Management, L.L.C. v. Cremona Bistro Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Paulsen v. YarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc., and Anglo-Dutch (Tenge), LLC v. Greenberg Peden, P.C., and Gerald J. SwonkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API