Legal Opinion

DeWorken v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1979No. 57848, 57849, 57850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Appellants have demonstrated no error in the trial court’s holding that, as a matter of law, appellee State F arm was not answerable for the alleged negligence of one David Underwood. That being the case, we affirm the court’s grant of appellee’s motion for summary judgment.

Appellee State Farm brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment that it had no obligation to defend David Underwood in any actions brought by appellants for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. Appellants William and Cynthia Parker were passengers in the car Underwood was driving,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Hemphill v. Home Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Wallace v. LessardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Allstate Insurance v. SpillersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API