Conway v. Wilson
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On motion to strike out answer.
1Opinion of the Court
Bird, V. C.
The motion to strike out goes to the whole answer, and in the language of the notice is because “ (1), that said answer is not *458responsive to the allegations of the bill of complaint, and does not set up any defence to said bill of complaint; (2), that said answer admits all the equity claimed in the bill.”
The last reason given makes it most plain that the motion is too broad. Where the complainant expressly charges an equity, and calls upon the defendant to answer such charge, he cannot call upon the court to strike all the answer out because it, or any part of it, admits just what…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Whipple v. FarrarMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Shattuck v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Wilson v. JosephIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Patten v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
- Zelnicker v. Brigham & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schneider v. SchmidtNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927