Legal Opinion · Dissent

Durben v. Montgomery

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 1920Published

Appeal from Izard Circuit. Court; J. B. Balter, Judge;

1DissentHart, J.

In State v. Jones, 25 Ark. 375, a motion was made to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The record in the circuit court recites: ‘ ‘ The court, being advised of the matters and things arising on the motion to dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction, heretofore filed, doth sustain the motion.” The record entry concludes with this recital without any final judgment upon the motion, or otherwise, and this court held it could not take cognizance of the appeal thereon.

In Reynolds v. Craycraft, 26 Ark. 468, the case was submitted to the court sitting as a jury an agreed statement of facts. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chatfield v. JarrattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Ex parte MortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  3. Reynolds v. CraycraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API