Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1902No. 2434PublishedCited by 11 opinions

A general statement of the facts proved is not required.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of cattle theft, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

The court charged the punishment "to be not less than two nor more than five years in the penitentiary,” whereas the punishment, by law, is not less than two nor more than four years. Exception was reserved to this portion of the charge. The court states in signing the bill: “I am of opinion the error complained of did not injure appellant’s rights, and the new trial prayed for should not be granted, under the law as it now is, under article…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Jewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. McCoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Odell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API