Legal Opinion
Foe v. Sprint/United Management. Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 15, 2000No. 98-2366-JWLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
This action arises out of pro se plaintiff Venita De Foe’s employment with defendant Sprint/United Management Company. On May 17, 2000, defendant moved for the dismissal of this action with prejudice as a sanction for plaintiffs repeated noncompliance with court orders. In addition, on June 2, 2000, Magistrate Judge Waxse ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for plaintiffs failure to appear at a scheduling conference, failure to confer with opposing counsel regarding scheduling issues,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ehrenhaus v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- George C. Jones, Jr., and Peggy Linn Jones v. Lee Thompson, A/K/A Morris Lee ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- M.M. v. ZavarasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Turnbull v. WilckenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beitman v. Correct Care SolutionsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Jefferson v. Amsted Rail Company, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Jefferson v. Amsted Rail Company, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Kellogg v. Watts Guerra, LLP REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation.District Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- United States Department of Labor v. Mr. Cao's LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024