Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Brill

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 23, 1942No. Civil Action No. 548Published

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, District Judge.

The plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that it was not on the risk covering the premises at 924 Park Avenue, Racine, Wisconsin-, on January 21, 1941. The defendant claims that a valid contract of oral insurance was in full force and effect.

The trial developed a sharp conflict of testimony as to just what occurred 'between the parties, especially on January 21, 1941. I find the following facts:

In December, 1940, defendant Max Brill was the owner of a number of residence properties in Racine, Wisconsin. His nephew, George Brill, was an insurance broker who customarily…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carlson v. GrimsrudWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Neuberger v. Aid Ass'n for LutheransWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Halvorsen v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API