Legal Opinion · Dissent

Preston Overton v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2016No. 2013-CT-01236-SCTPublished

1DissentRandolph, Presiding Justice

¶ 23. Without speculating as to the trial judge’s finding that a deliberate violation occurred, I direct my fellow justices to the contents, of the record before us as the source of my qualms with the majority opinion. The trial judge did not mince his words at trial, expressly finding Overton’s untimely disclosure was an effort to conduct a “trial by ambush” and pronouncing the untimely disclosure as “an egregious violation.” He then followed the precedent of this Court and foiled a “trial by ambush.”14 The record in this case contains (1) evidence in support of exclusion, (2) a clear…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Byrom v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Delno v. Market St. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  4. Skaggs v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  5. David Michael Ashmore v. Mississippi Authority on Educational TelevisionMississippi Supreme Court · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API