Legal Opinion

Leitch v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1910No. 8994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior courf for Chehalis county, Sheeks, J., entered April 2, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in consolidated actions to foreclose pledges of shares of corporate-stock.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

These suits were commenced to foreclose certain pledges of shares of the capital stock of the Leitch*447Walker Shingle Company, a corporation, which were pledged by defendants to the plaintiff and his associates to secure the payment of certain promissory notes. There is no controversy over the execution of the notes and pledges, and the defense in each case being based upon the same facts, the cases were consolidated by stipulation of all parties and tried together. By request of the defendants the trial was before the court and a jury, though it is conceded that the issues are of equitable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clambey v. CoplandWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Rathjens v. MerrillWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Wintermute v. CarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. White Crest Canning Co. v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Plough Hardware Co. v. BruceWashington Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API