Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moon v. Investment Board

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1977No. 12357Published

1DissentShepard, Justice

I am impelled to dissent for a number of reasons. This Court has since statehood indulged in the presumption of the constitutionality of legislative action. Engelking v. Investment Board, 93 Idaho 217, 458 P.2d 213 (1969); Leonardson v. Moon, 92 Idaho 796, 451 P.2d 542 (1969); Caesar v. Williams, 84 Idaho 254, 371 P.2d 241 (1962); State ex rel. Brassey v. Hanson, 81 Idaho 403, 342 P.2d 706 (1959). In my view, the legislature has obeyed the constitutional mandate that the Public School Fund, while “inviolate” be “securely and profitably invested as may be by law directed.’’ (Emphasis…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EngelkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Leonardson v. MoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Engelking v. Investment BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Caesar v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. Brassey v. HansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API