Legal Opinion

Barrielle v. Bettman

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 3, 1912No. 6,382PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action by H. Barrielle, Ainé, against Morris L,. Bettman, surviving partner, etc. On motions of plaintiff and defendant for a new 1 rial.

1Opinion of the Court

SATER, District Judge.

The question is: Shall a new trial be granted? The contracts for the glacé fruits mentioned in the pleadings were made in 1906, at Apt, in the republic of France. The goods were delivered at Marseilles to the defendant’s agent and shipped to Cincinnati. The vendor, Barrielle, alleging himself to be a citizen of such republic, sued in this court to recover the purchase price of the goods, and subsequently died. Thereupon Paul Barrielle, Marie Beauchamp, Eugenie Beauchamp, and Martlie Barrielle, a minor, by Paul Beauchamp, her guardian, to obtain a revivor of such suit and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Childress v. EmorySupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  4. Savage v. . O'NeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Dixon's Executors v. Ramsay's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1806

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Estate of KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Macey v. DudasOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Baid's, Inc. v. FrankelOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Goldhardt v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API