Legal Opinion

Rauw v. Huling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1953PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is an action for damages for injuries to person and to property, claimed to have been suffered as the result of the negligent operation of a motor truck, brought by Mathew H. Itauw, as plaintiff, against Harley Thomas Huling and Yernon Sparks, individually and as copartners, as defendants. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

Prior to and at the time of the accident involved in this litigation, plaintiff was a salesman and in connection with his work owned and operated a Dodge coupe automobile. Defendants were copartners engaged in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Senkirik v. ROYCEOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Gwin v. CrawfordOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Ceccacci v. GarreOregon Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. WojahnOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lasley v. Combined Transport, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Lemons v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Burrows v. NashOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. McPherson v. CochranOregon Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API