Legal Opinion

Keesee v. Eddleman

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 26, 2024No. 4:23-cv-01158Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ZACHERY SCOTT KEESEE PLAINTIFF ADC #175621 v. CASE NO. 4:23-CV-01158-BSM TRAVIS L. EDDLEMAN DEFENDANT ORDER Zachery Keesee’s

42 U.S.C. section 1983

claim against Travis Eddleman is dismissed with prejudice sua sponte because it is precluded. See Emerald Pointe, LLC v. Taney Cnty. Mo.,

78 F.4th 428, 432-33

(8th Cir. 2023) (claims can be dismissed sua sponte to avoid litigating claims that were dismissed in a prior suit). Keesee is precluded from relitigating whether Eddleman acted as a federal task force…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craven v. Fulton Sanitation Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Emerald Pointe, LLC v. Taney County MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  3. Doe Run Resources Corporation v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API