State v. Hight
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
GREENWOOD, Presiding Judge:
T1 Defendant Richard W. Hight Jr. appeals the amount of restitution the trial court ordered subsequent to his guilty pleas to burglary, possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, and criminal mischief. We affirm.
T2 "Trial courts are vested with wide latitude and discretion in sentencing, and [appellate courts] will not disturb a trial court's restitution order unless it exceeds that prescribed by law or otherwise abused its discretion." State v. Corbitt, 2003 UT App 417, ¶ 6, 82 P.3d 211 (citation and internal quotation marks…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. CorbittCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- State v. BickleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LudlowCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- State v. HarvellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- State v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- State v. WadsworthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.