Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1980No. Appeal, No. 43 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Employer Bethlehem Mines Corporation appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s decision that Claimant John Stavarski was eligible to receive compensation under Section 108(e) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Section 1 of the Act of October 17, 1972, P.L. 930, as amended, 77 P.S. §27.1 (e), because he was disabled by an occupational disease.

*543The claimant had worked in the coal mining industry for more than thirty-five years. From approximately…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Hazleton v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Crucible Steel, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harold Jamison Trucking v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Beehler v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API