Legal Opinion · Dissent
County of Columbia v. Continental Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 8, 1993Published
1Dissent
Crew III, J. (dissenting).
The threshold issue on this appeal is whether the personal injury coverage provided by the policies issued by defendants, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Continental Insurance Company and Firemen’s Insurance Company of Newark, N.J. encompasses the claims made by H.K.S. Hunt Club, Inc. (hereinafter HKS) in the underlying action. The majority has concluded that the complaint at issue here does nothing more than plead a cause of action for environmental property damage. We are of the view, however, that the complaint sets forth sufficient facts to bring the claim of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Rapid-American Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Barash v. PA. TERM. REAL ESTATE CORP.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.