Legal Opinion

Goebelbecker v. STATE, BD. OF REVIEW

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 1, 1958PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

53 N.J. Super. 53 (1958)

146 A.2d 488

EMIL GOEBELBECKER, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AND CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 10, 1958.

Decided December 1, 1958.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and HANEMAN.

Mr. Peter Cammelieri argued the cause for claimant-appellant (Mr. Harvey Smith, of counsel; Mr. Edward Casel, on the brief).

Mr. Edward A. Kaplan argued the cause for respondent Division of Employment Security, Department…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Campbell Soup Co. v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Krauss v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Barclay v. Wetmore & Morse Granite Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  4. Dentici v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Spotts Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brady v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Zielenski v. Bd. of Rev., Div. of Emp. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. Domenico v. LABOR & INDUSTRY DEPT. REVIEW BD.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  4. Condo v. BD. OF REVIEW, DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Morgan v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employ. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API