Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Courtin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1936No. 16436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

This is a suit on a promissory note. Soli-dary judgment is sought against P. E. Courtin, the maker, and James E. Courtin, the indorser. When defendants received citation they filed a joint answer in which they alleged that the note had been paid by two certain checks which they filed with their answer, and which checks were dated prior to the maturity of the note and were made by P. E. Courtin. When the case was called for trial on the issue as presented by the plea that the note had been paid prior to its maturity, counsel for James E. Courtin, the indorser, filed an exception…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  2. Veasey v. PetersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Lewy v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Montfort ex rel. Montfort v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  5. Union Bank v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hester v. RobertsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API