Legal Opinion

Froehlich v. CACH, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 13, 2013No. 3:12-CV-363PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*455DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #10); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. # 11); OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. # 7)

WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth in the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 10), issued February 25, 2013, as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court’s file and the applicable law, this Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety, and OVERRULES Plaintiffs Objections thereto (Doc. # 11).

P…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Howard v. CitiFinancial, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2002
  4. Medina v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  5. Johnson v. HarperDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Neodesha v. BP Corp. North America Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2016
  2. Milburn v. Zurich American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  3. Youngers v. CoreCivic, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API