Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Stephen C. Perry

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 19, 1988No. 88-1475PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

We have before us a petition for Writs of Mandamus or Prohibition. 1 Petitioners wish to be free from a protective order limiting the matters on which they may speak. In addition, they would have us order the reinstatement of one of them as a representative in the underlying proceedings, since he was ejected from the proceedings for violating the order.

The controversy before us is an offshoot of certain proceedings currently being held before an administrative law judge (AU). The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited General Dynamics for alleged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Bruce CutlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. In Re Asbestos School Litigation Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. In Re Stephen C. PerryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Providence Journal Co. v. NewtonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API