Legal Opinion

State v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1898No. Nos. 11,032-(16)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Defendant appealed from a judgment entered in the district court for Norman county, pursuant to a verdict finding the defendant guilty, and to the findings and order of Ives, J., adjudging the defendant to be the father of a bastard child and charge'able with its support.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from the judgment of the district court of Norman county adjudging him to be the father of a bastard child and charging him with its support.

The evidence was ample to sustain the verdict of guilty, and the only errors assigned relate to alleged errors in the instructions given to the jury. The jury were instructed as follows:

“If you have reason to believe that any one of the witnesses who have testified here has testified falsely, you have a right to discredit his testimony entirely; and if you believe a part of his testi*75mony is true and a part…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schuek v. HagarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. Dallemand v. JanneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. State v. SchuellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. State v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Demerce v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Schloss v. JosephsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API