Legal Opinion
Reed v. United States. Parkhurst v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 27, 1953No. 13461, 13464PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
These cases were separately tried 'but were consolidated for purposes of appeal inasmuch as the main question they present is identical. The charge against each appellant was that, having been duly placed in Class I-A under the provisions of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 451 et seq., and ordered to report for induction into the armed forces, he refused to submit to induction. Verdicts of guilty were returned in each case.
Appellants are members of Christ’s Clmroh of the Golden Rule, and both claimed exemption from military service…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rase v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Tyrrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Elder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Richard Secor Corliss, United States of America v. Fred August Heise, United States of America v. Walter HeroldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Dale Verne Deremer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- John Alan Tomlinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- United States v. LybrandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.