Legal Opinion

Mauricio v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2011No. 02S03-1009-PC-501PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Clifton Mauricio was convicted of murder and sentenced to fifty years in prison at a moment when there were conflicting statutes on the books as respects the penalty for murder. We later resolved which ~ of the two statutes should be applied, using the rule of lenity. The General Assembly subsequently amended the statute. Because we cannot say that the trial court would have sentenced Mauricio to fifty years notwithstanding its reference to the statute later held inapplicable, we reverse the denial of post-conviction relief and remand for resentencing.

Facts and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Weatherford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Henley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Romana Balderas v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Conder v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Dannie Engram v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Ronald A. Bohannon v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Thomas A. Dexter v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API