Legal Opinion

Neuman v. Grant

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1907No. 2,439PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from, District Court, Flathead County; J. E. Erickson, Judge. Action by A. T. Neuman against E. R. Grant. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

This is an appeal from a decree of foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, entered by the district court of Flathead county. The ■complaint contains two counts, so called. The charging part *78of the first count is as follows: “That heretofore, to-wit, on or about the fifteenth day of August, 1905, this plaintiff and the said defendant, Grant, entered into a contract and agreement, as follows: Said plaintiff, at the special instance and request of the defendant, Grant, agreed to dig, and excavate, wall up with brick, line with cement, and finish in a good and workmanlike manner, one fifty-barrel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sussdorff v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Burgess v. HelmNevada Supreme Court · 1898
  3. McGlauflin v. WormserMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Blankenship v. DeckerMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Berry v. CraigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Keneally v. OrgainMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Waite v. Shoemaker & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Bovee v. HellandMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wilcox v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Mills v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API