Legal Opinion

In re Murphy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 9, 1999No. 24987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent failed to answer the formal charges filed against him and failed to appear at his panel hearing, and is therefore deemed to have admitted the factual allegations made in the charges. Rule 24 of Rule 413, SCACR. The subpanel and the full panel recommended disbarment for misconduct arising out of respondent’s administration of his aunt’s estate. We suspend respondent for nine months effective upon the filing of this opinion.

*198Respondent’s aunt’s estate was opened in 1992, and respondent and his brother were appointed co-personal representatives. Respondent removed certain records…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. In Re BarkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API