State v. DeGeorge
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Judge.
In this criminal appeal, the State claims the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to quash the bill of information because defendant’s written motion asserted only a misjoinder of offenses while her oral arguments supporting the motion and the trial court’s reason for granting the motion were both based upon prescription. We agree. LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 536 requires a motion to quash “be in writing” and “specify distinctly the grounds on which it is based,” and directs that “[t]he court shall hear no objection based on grounds not stated in the motion.” We, therefore,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- State v. ArabieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- State v. RheamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- State v. LangLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- State v. HowellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ArmsteadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State of Louisiana v. Calvin M. Williams Jr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- State v. WellsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. WellsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018