Legal Opinion

Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1961No. 39156PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The question presented is whether the payees’ indorsements of bank checks issued by a highway subcontractor to laborers, carry with them assignments by the laborers of their claims under the provisions of the contractor’s payment bond required by statute. Clearly the plaintiff was not among those for whom the express terms of the statute required protection. “. . . all subcontractors and all persons supplying labor, materials, machinery, and equipment in the prosecution of the work provided for in said contract.” Code Ann. § 23-1705 (2). Neither is plaintiff included as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turk v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Smith v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Finch v. EnkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Shoshoni Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Alley v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J.W.D., Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API