Legal Opinion

Murphy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 24, 1964No. 39-57PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, Chief Judge

Plaintiff1 sues for breach of his contract of March 1Y,1950, with the Bureau of Reclamation of the Department of the Interior. This contract, No. 12r-18946, provided for construction of the Fort Sumner. Diversion Dam across the Pecos River at a point near Fort Sumner, New Mexico. Plaintiff contends that the termination of his right to proceed with the whole of the contract work, exercised by the Contracting Officer by letter dated January 30, 1951, under Article 9 of the contract, was wrongful because beyond the terms of that provision.

Article 9 provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

If the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Brett Arnold, P.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Nelson, Inc.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API