Commonwealth v. Rush
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Petitioner filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act in November, 1967, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and that counsel had a conflict of interest because he represented a co-defendant. Petitioner also alleged that he was denied the assistance of counsel to perfect an appeal in accordance with Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 (1963).
The lower court denied the petition without holding a hearing.
Our Supreme Court has often stated that: “The allegations of the petition, if true, entitle petitioner to relief, and since his allegations are not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CimaszewskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BenjaminSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. HillsmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. CimaszewskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.