Legal Opinion

Sinatra v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1934No. 2914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*483OPINION

By FUNK, J.

The record in this case is quite long, and we therefore cannot go into- a detailed analysis of all the evidence, so will refer particularly to the testimony of the defendant, to the other evidence only in a. general way, and to some general principles controlling trial and reviewing courts.

It must be remembered that this question involves not merely the testimony of the two eye-witnesses as against that of the alibi evidence for defendant, but that the identification evidence and alibi evidence as given by said witnesses must be considered together with all the other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moeskops v. BodmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oberlin v. RuffingOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API