Legal Opinion

Murphy v. People ex rel. West Chicago Park Commissioners

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 15, 1906No. Gen. No. 13,135Published

Mandamus proceeding. Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Axel Ohyteatjs, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

From the foregoing statement it will be seen that the only matter put in issue by the answer is a denial that the order of affirmance of the Supreme Court filed in the County Court in Cummings ei <xl. vs. The People ex rel., is an affirmance of the judgment rendered by that court against the property covered by objection No. 147. Plaintiffs proffered no evidence to sustain this contention, contenting themselves with an objection to the introduction in evidence by relator of a certified copy of that order of affirmance, which was received by the trial court over such objections. An examination…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Potwin v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. People ex rel. Huck v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. People ex rel. Kochersperger v. WadlowIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. E. A. Cummings & Co. v. People ex rel. HanbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API