Legal Opinion

Rudolph's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1937No. Appeal, 267PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

The estate of appellant’s wife was distributed to her collateral heirs, and the appellant excluded from participation under the Intestate Act of June 7,1917, P. L. 429, §5 (20 PS §41). He has appealed from the dismissal of his exceptions to the schedule of distribution and from the affirmance of the decree of the auditing judge by the court in banc. At the conclusion of the taking of testimony on the exceptions the auditing judge found: “The husband, Gustav, did not support her for several years before her death and therefore cannot be a distributee.”

Katarina Rudolph…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schreckengost's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Hill v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. D'Arros's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Estate of AlamenczakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Jury EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Rodieck v. RodieckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. McLiesh EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Pruski's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API