Legal Opinion
Allen v. Bank of Angelica
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 24, 1929No. 270PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The appellant is dissatisfied only because he was not awarded the gross proceeds of the sales, instead of the net proceeds. That is all there is in this appeal, and makes it stand out in bold relief that the claim on which the appellant has had a judgment which has been satisfied is exactly the same claim on which he would again seek recovery on his theory of the law applicable to this case. As not infrequently happens, he has recovered less than he claimed the right to recover. His failure was not due to any dispute as to the facts, but solely to his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Embry v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Albright v. OysterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Carson Lumber Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- United States v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Peck v. RichterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roger Dileo v. Richard GreenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- In re Electric Power & Light Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Altman v. Shopping Center Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Spanel v. BerkmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Richard W. Wilson, Individually and as Assignee of Gustave Simons v. The Pantasote CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.