Legal Opinion

Recouvreur v. Carreon

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 12, 2013No. C 12-03435 RSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Reeouvreur has filed two separate motions seeking award of attorney fees in the total amount of $77,765.25. The first seeks fees incurred as a result of service attempts and time spent on the attorney fee motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(2), and the second seeks fees as a prevailing party under the Lanham Act. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7—1(b), this matter is appropriate for disposition without oral argument, particularly in this instance as any further…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CNC Software, LLC v. Global Engineering Limited Liability CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Salhotra v. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. San Diego County Credit Union v. Citizens Equity First Credit UnionDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API