Moore v. City of Newport
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Sampson—
Affirming in part and reversing in part.
The above styled cases involve similar questions and will be considered together. The facts are in substance the same, except one of the appellants was convicted under a city ordinance and the other under a state statute. On •the 5th of September, 1922, Harry Sutt was charged in the police court with the offense of gaming, under section 1977, Kentucky Statutes, and upon a trial was found guilty and his punishment fixed at a fine of $20.00 and costs. In default of the payment of the fine and costs he was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Allen v. McGuireMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Paris v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jamison v. FlannerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- City of Clovis v. HamiltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Fletcher v. GrahamKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Fletcher v. GrahamKentucky Supreme Court · 2006