Legal Opinion

Balcom v. Kohno

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1923No. 17716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— Appellant, who was a dealer in farm produce, entered into the following written contract with respondent, who is a farmer:

“M. Kohno, Oct. 23, 1919.
“Grandview, Wash.
“We hereby offer to purchase from you at the price of $37 per ton, between 8 and 10 cars of number one gems to be loaded by you f. o. b. cars at Grandview, Washington, number one quality, delivery to be made as follows: As soon as possible, sort to be good commercial one, 4 oz. and larger, reasonably smooth.

This contract covers all his potatoes.

No. 272. By F. M. Balcom.

“I hereby accept the foregoing offer and acknowledge receipt…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacks v. BlazerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Balcom v. KohnoWashington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API