Legal Opinion

Faltico v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 1936No. 30,834PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

After an adverse verdict, defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.

The action is to recover for personal injuries received in a collision between an automobile in which plaintiff was riding and one of defendant’s streetcars. Injuries to certain cervical vertebrae are alleged. Plaintiff, a radio repairman, was unable to work for about a month after the accident. No loss of earning power is shown by the record. The $5,000 verdict can only be explained by the jury’s acceptance of testimony on behalf of plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Cram v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Sund v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Guile v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Johnson v. BattlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Berg v. UllevigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Preveden v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Tillman v. Stanley Iron WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API