Faltico v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
After an adverse verdict, defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.
The action is to recover for personal injuries received in a collision between an automobile in which plaintiff was riding and one of defendant’s streetcars. Injuries to certain cervical vertebrae are alleged. Plaintiff, a radio repairman, was unable to work for about a month after the accident. No loss of earning power is shown by the record. The $5,000 verdict can only be explained by the jury’s acceptance of testimony on behalf of plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cram v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Sund v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Guile v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Johnson v. BattlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Berg v. UllevigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Preveden v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Tillman v. Stanley Iron WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.